contentSlug

type

ContentSlug_ContentQuery

slug

ContentPageContentQuery

content

trendingContent

query ContentSlug_ContentQuery(
  $contentSlug: String!
  $type: [ContentType!]
) {
  ...ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO
}

fragment CompanyDetails_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    name
    description
    pageUrl
    id
  }
}

fragment ContentBasicInfo on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  type
  title
  lang
  companies {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  tags {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  ...PublishingDetails
  ...Reactions
}

fragment ContentMetadata on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  title
  lang
  pageUrl
  alternatePageUrls: translations {
    __typename
    pageUrl
    lang
  }
  imgUrl
  description
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
}

fragment ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO on Query {
  content(slug: $contentSlug, type: $type) {
    __typename
    id
    type
    title
    isPremium
    lang
    htmlBody
    summary
    companies {
      forum {
        latestPosts {
          ...ForumPosts
        }
      }
      name
      id
      viewerIsFollowing
      pageUrl
      defaultInstrument {
        isin
        id
        marketOpen
        marketClose
        marketplace {
          region
        }
        returns {
          total
        }
      }
    }
    tags {
      viewerIsFollowing
      id
      name
      pageUrl
    }
    createdAt
    ... on Video {
      liveTime
    }
    ... on Webcast {
      liveTime
    }
    slug
    ... on CompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on StockExchangeRelease {
      reportUrl
    }
    ...ContentBasicInfo
    ...ContentMetadata
    ...PriceAndRecommendation_Content
    ...CompanyDetails_Content
    ...ReportLink_Content
    ...KeyFigures_Content
  }
  ...TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn
}

fragment ForumPosts on ForumPost {
  text
  likesCount
  url
  author
  postedAt
  authorImgUrl
}

fragment KeyFigures_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    defaultInstrument {
      estimateData {
        modelType
        reportingCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        transaction {
          date
          actualized {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
            nav
            navPerShare
            opexOfNav
            quarterlySharePrice
          }
          estimates {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
            nav
            navPerShare
            opexOfNav
            quarterlySharePrice
          }
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PriceAndRecommendation_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  companies {
    name
    pageUrl
    defaultInstrument {
      priceData {
        tradeCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        priceData {
          date
          lastPrice
          tradeCurrency
        }
        transaction {
          date
          recommendation
          targetPrice
        }
        prevTransaction {
          recommendation
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PublishingDetails on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  publishers {
    name
    imgUrl
  }
  authors {
    __typename
    id
    name
    slug
    imgUrl
    jobTitle
  }
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
  }
}

fragment Reactions on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  reactionGroups {
    reactionType
    reactionsCount
    viewerReacted
  }
}

fragment ReportLink_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  isPremium
  ... on CompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on StockExchangeRelease {
    reportUrl
  }
}

fragment TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn on Query {
  trendingContent(type: ARTICLE) {
    __typename
    id
    title
    lang
    pageUrl
    createdAt
    type
    imgUrl
    companies {
      squareLogoUrl
      name
      id
    }
    authors {
      __typename
      imgUrl
      id
    }
    publishers {
      imgUrl
    }
  }
}


innofactor-as-expected-tender-offer-not-yet-materialized-but-likely-in-due-course

__typename

title

isPremium

lang

htmlBody

summary

companies

createdAt

publishers

authors

reactionGroups

pageUrl

translations

imgUrl

description

Analyst

Joni Grönqvist

The interest also arrived. In Nordnet, the interest was paid a day later than the undisputed portion of 1.68 EUR/share.

Innofactor’s undisputed share of €1.68 arrived in the account yesterday. The entire process is not yet over; the trusted man demands disclosure of competing offers and related documents, which are reportedly lost, but might be found if the arbitration court orders their publication. Oral hearing in June. It’s pretty much 50/50 whether the redemption price will be €1.68 or €1.86; a lot depends on whether the documents are found and what they say.

Risto Linturi’s Facebook post:(Bolding mine) "A long stint has concluded. Thanks to Sami Ensio for excellent cooperation, which will continue at least as a friendship. I stepped down from Innofactor’s board now that Innofactor, with its new owners, gained the desired freedom from the shackles of the stock exchange. I agree with Sami that operating as a listed company causes various burdens for both the board and other management, and I couldn’t appreciate the absurd nitpicking about whether something is reported in the late evening or early morning, and numerous other seemingly completely irrelevant observations with which the stock exchange directs boards to focus on formalities instead of their actual work, which truly cannot have any impact on investors. Innofactor was founded within the shell of a company that Microsoft importer Mikrolink’s Timo Havulinna and Peter Burman had acquired and initially partially, and finally entirely, sold to R. Linturi Oy and Mikko Setälä for the import of Windows applications. Previous business areas included, among others, a horse breeding farm. I was the chairman of the board of that company starting in 1985. The Windows application import business was sold, and the company changed its name from Simul Oy to Yritysmikrot Oy, with publishing as its line of business. As other interests took over, the publishing activities ceased. The most recent book published by Yritysmikrot was Sata ilmiötä 2000-2020, which I co-wrote with Ilkka Hannula. A kind of launch for a futurist’s career, of which 7,000 copies were printed and sold. The most significant impact was likely from the Yritysmikrot magazine, which for a few years around the turn of the 1980s and 1990s highlighted the challenges of microcomputer networks and system work related to microcomputers. But in 2000, the company’s name changed to Innofactor Oy, and Sami Ensio took the reins; my spouse Kaija and I remained board members after I had been the chairman of the board of that company for 15 years. My new board role continued until the reverse listing in December 2010, and then again during a difficult period for the company from spring 2018 until today. This forms a path of over 30 years, which thus ended today. A great and multifaceted journey. Good luck to Innofactor, which now operates across all Nordic countries."

Inderes              Innofactor Oyj:n tilinpäätöstiedote 2024 (IFRS) - Inderes    Innofactor Oyj:n tilinpäätöstiedote 28.2.2025 klo 9.00 Konsernin tunnusluvut, IFRS .1.7.– 31.12.20241.7.– 31.12.2023Muutos 1.1.– 31.12.20241.1.– 31.12.2023MuutosLiikevaihto tuhatta euroa36 52539...                             Buying Innofactor from the stock exchange left a bit of a sour taste in my mouth.  Usually, I wish all Finnish listed companies well, but a little schadenfreude came over me when I glanced at the report. Revenue is decreasing and the result is weak.  I got pretty good money from this in connection with the tender offer

Was it clear when the redemption matter will be finalized? I also received a letter, but after a quick read-through, I don’t remember.

In arbitration, the rest will receive at least €1.68 per share, but the arbitral tribunal may order an even higher price, such as €1.86.

That’s how it is: the shares were sold at the offer price, and the increased offer coming in depended on the price doubling, as Ensio had drawn up such a document. But indeed, one can get a really good return from them if one waits for redemption. Of course, then the capital is tied up in the asset.

Innofactor

Innofactor reported on Friday that the Onni Bidco consortium has initially acquired an additional 2.55% of the shares in Innofactor during the second offer period. As a result, the company now holds an 84.6% stake after the tender offer periods. 

Translation: Original published in Finnish on 10/7/2024 at 8:25 am EEST.
Innofactor reported on Friday that the Onni Bidco consortium has initially acquired an additional 2.55% of the shares in Innofactor during the second offer period. Onni Bidco will announce the final result of the offer period on October 8, 2024. As a result, the company now holds 84.6% of the shares and voting rights in Innofactor after the tender offer periods. This is below the bid condition, which is over 90%.&#xa0;
As we thought possible before the start of the second offer period at the end of September, the consortium did not gain the additional stake it was seeking (around 10 percentage points) during the relatively short extension period. However, we still expect that the takeover will ultimately be completed and that Onni Bidco will acquire more than 90% of the shares and votes. In our view, the offer is still a good one for shareholders from a number of perspectives and we believe there is a strong likelihood that the offer will be successful. Our comments on the offer at the end of September, an update on the company&apos;s operational situation and the still valid rationale for the recommendation can be found <a href="https://www.inderes.se/research/innofactor-offer-likely-to-succeed-in-due-course">here</a>.

Innofactor: As expected, tender offer not yet materialized, but likely in due course

Forum discussions