contentSlug

type

ContentSlug_ContentQuery

slug

ContentPageContentQuery

content

trendingContent

query ContentSlug_ContentQuery(
  $contentSlug: String!
  $type: [ContentType!]
) {
  ...ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO
}

fragment CompanyDetails_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    name
    description
    pageUrl
    id
  }
}

fragment ContentBasicInfo on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  type
  title
  lang
  companies {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  tags {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  ...PublishingDetails
  ...Reactions
}

fragment ContentMetadata on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  title
  lang
  pageUrl
  alternatePageUrls: translations {
    __typename
    pageUrl
    lang
  }
  imgUrl
  description
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
}

fragment ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO on Query {
  content(slug: $contentSlug, type: $type) {
    __typename
    id
    type
    title
    isPremium
    lang
    htmlBody
    summary
    companies {
      forum {
        latestPosts {
          ...ForumPosts
        }
      }
      name
      id
      viewerIsFollowing
      pageUrl
      defaultInstrument {
        isin
        id
        marketOpen
        marketClose
        marketplace {
          region
        }
        returns {
          total
        }
      }
    }
    tags {
      viewerIsFollowing
      id
      name
      pageUrl
    }
    createdAt
    ... on Video {
      liveTime
    }
    ... on Webcast {
      liveTime
    }
    slug
    ... on CompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on StockExchangeRelease {
      reportUrl
    }
    ...ContentBasicInfo
    ...ContentMetadata
    ...PriceAndRecommendation_Content
    ...CompanyDetails_Content
    ...ReportLink_Content
    ...KeyFigures_Content
  }
  ...TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn
}

fragment ForumPosts on ForumPost {
  text
  likesCount
  url
  author
  postedAt
  authorImgUrl
}

fragment KeyFigures_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    defaultInstrument {
      estimateData {
        modelType
        reportingCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        transaction {
          date
          actualized {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
          }
          estimates {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
          }
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PriceAndRecommendation_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  companies {
    name
    pageUrl
    defaultInstrument {
      priceData {
        tradeCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        priceData {
          date
          lastPrice
          tradeCurrency
        }
        transaction {
          date
          recommendation
          targetPrice
        }
        prevTransaction {
          recommendation
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PublishingDetails on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  publishers {
    name
    imgUrl
  }
  authors {
    __typename
    id
    name
    slug
    imgUrl
    jobTitle
  }
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
  }
}

fragment Reactions on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  reactionGroups {
    reactionType
    reactionsCount
    viewerReacted
  }
}

fragment ReportLink_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  isPremium
  ... on CompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on StockExchangeRelease {
    reportUrl
  }
}

fragment TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn on Query {
  trendingContent(type: ARTICLE) {
    __typename
    id
    title
    lang
    pageUrl
    createdAt
    type
    imgUrl
    companies {
      squareLogoUrl
      name
      id
    }
    authors {
      __typename
      imgUrl
      id
    }
    publishers {
      imgUrl
    }
  }
}


detection-technology-results-largely-as-expected-evli

__typename

title

isPremium

lang

htmlBody

summary

companies

createdAt

publishers

authors

reactionGroups

pageUrl

translations

imgUrl

description

Detection Technology is a global solution and service provider of X-ray detectors for medical, security and industrial applications. The company's solutions range from sensor components to optimized detector systems with microcircuits, electronics, mechanics, software and algorithms. The company has offices in Finland, India, China, France and the USA. Detection Technology was founded in 1991 and has its headquarters in Espoo.

Saa toki!  Key downside risks: Geopolitical risks related to China and the US, FX risks, increased competition, price pressure, M&A risks, the global security outlook, the global economic outlook, advances in imaging technology, quality risks and the availability of components. Key upside risks: A fast recovery in aviation security investments, addressable market expansion and new growth opportunities, market share gains, margin recovery, China economic stimulus measures and a public takeover. Estimate and valuation changes Looking at recent developments and considering company-specific measures taken, we estimate a 50% y/y EBIT recovery in 2026 after the 2025 slump, with further but less pronounced improvements in 2027 (10% y/y). Our base case, driven by 3% market growth, TFT panel expansion and Security investments, points to respective 2025-31 sales and EBIT CAGRs of 4.7% and 14.2% (an average margin of 11.9%), while price pressure in China is likely to limit further upside. Based on our upside/downside scenario analyses, we find slightly positive risk/reward, but we reiterate Hold with an unchanged DCF- and multiples-based fair value of EUR 11.7. To find significant upside, one would need to model ~7% medium-term annual growth, or a ~15% discount to peers, which we find difficult to justify.

Could I get a brief explanation why Nordea is not quite as bullish as Inderes regarding DeeTee? What kind of forecasts for next year?

Nordea published its updated Detection Technology analysis. Recommendation: HOLD, Fair value: €11.70.

If DT interests you, the CMD recording can be recommended. The company and market open up in a completely different way. A good event, which should have been organized years ago..

I read through the entire thread, and I also need to practice using the search function. Thanks for the clear answers

Hello! Our search function seems to be working poorly; I believe it has been mentioned much more often historically. But the assumption has been that Smiths is a significant customer of DT. There’s no factual basis for this, as it’s not a public reference. However, on CMD’s slides, DT stated that 3/4 of the major players in Security CT are the company’s customers, so the probabilities likely support this assumption.   In principle, yes, but since the plan is unknown, it’s impossible to estimate the outcome.  Yes, I believe the pricing power is reasonably good, although there’s always a certain amount of pressure, and price is also a function of volumes. However, DT, in my understanding, faces significantly greater pressure with Medical giants, where volumes are an order of magnitude larger, and there’s more competition. I wouldn’t expect better terms; margins will more likely come from renewable products and, on the other hand, from improving our own cost-effectiveness. This is a business subject to price erosion, but the margin level has been maintained quite well.

I can only find two mentions of Smiths in this thread using the search function. Is Smiths an OEM customer of Deete? If so, one could assume Smiths will invest even more in growth with the new owner, thus benefiting Deete as well. What kind of pricing power does Deete have with such a customer? Smiths is probably also trying to improve its margins by negotiating better terms for itself (when the contract expires),

Detection Technology

DT’s Q4 results came in largely as expected as EBITA improved by EUR 0.6m y/y despite a flat top line. There weren’t big surprises in terms of sales mix. DT sees Q1’25 top line flat, while double...

DT’s Q4 results came in largely as expected as EBITA improved by EUR 0.6m y/y despite a flat top line. There weren’t big surprises in terms of sales mix. DT sees Q1’25 top line flat, while double-digit growth should continue in Q2’25 when all three broad product application areas are expected to grow.